GatewayEnforcer

Regulated Industry

GatewayEnforcer is for regulated business — organizations that answer to someone for what happens to their data. Government contractors under GSAR and the FAR. Hospitals and health systems under HIPAA and HITECH. Banks, insurers, and funds under their examiners. Law firms holding privileged material. Any company operating in the European Union under the GDPR and the EU AI Act.

For these organizations the question about AI is not whether it is useful. It is whether you can prove what happened to the information after it left your hands. Every regulation on this page reduces to the same demand: know where the data went, keep it from being retained or trained on, and show — with evidence, not assurance — that it was destroyed when the work was done.

That is what this architecture was built for. The control plane runs inside your own Microsoft Azure tenant. Sessions run in volatile memory and retain nothing; on Gateway Sessions Pro, the call record is written only to storage in your own subscription. Every session closes with a signed Certificate of Incineration™ you can verify yourself, independently of Heaviside AI. It is an architecture a regulated business can put in front of its auditors, its contracting officers, and its counsel — because the guarantees are structural, not promised.

GSAR 552.239-7001

GSA’s Basic Safeguarding of Artificial Intelligence Systems clause, still proposed, would turn federal AI doctrine into contract language. Four of its core obligations are discharged directly by this architecture — including the prohibition on training with Government data, which here is not a policy but an impossibility, because nothing persists to train on.

(c)(1)Information safeguarding

Requires: covered information processed by the AI system stays within the agency’s authorized boundary.

Answered by in-tenant execution. The control plane runs inside the customer’s own Azure subscription. There is no place outside your tenant for covered information to go.

(c)(2)No unauthorized retention

Requires: the AI system must not retain covered information beyond what is authorized.

Answered by volatile-only processing. Sessions run exclusively in RAM; SDIP-6™ overwrites session buffers in six passes before memory is reclaimed. Nothing is written to disk, cache, or log during handling. On Gateway Sessions Pro, the call record you keep is written only to storage in your own subscription.

(c)(3)Auditable disposition

Requires: proper disposition of covered information must be demonstrable — evidence, not assurance.

Answered by the Certificate of Incineration™. A SHA-256 signed receipt on every session, verifiable independently of Heaviside AI.

(d)Subcontractor flow-down

Requires: safeguarding obligations flow down to subcontractors handling covered information.

Answered by the zero-trust operator posture. Heaviside AI holds no customer keys, data, or session content. With no operator data path beneath the customer, there is no subcontractor exposure to flow down.

Presidential AI doctrine and the EU AI Act

The same three questions run through both regimes: custody, retention, proof. In the United States, four Presidential documents define how the Executive Branch expects AI to be bought, run, and proven, and ten of their directives are discharged directly by this architecture. In the European Union, the AI Act’s general application date passed on August 2, 2026, and its high-risk obligations apply from December 2, 2027; dedicated EU deployments run inside the customer’s own Azure EU regions, aligned with the GDPR’s data-minimization principle — satisfied by having nothing stored.

The document-by-document treatment, with the primary sources on file, lives on the AI Regulation page →

Compliance documents

The documents your security, legal, and contracting teams need — no form required.

Primary sources — the statutes, orders, and clauses themselves — are on file in full on the AI Regulation page.

We do not certify your compliance

We hand you the architecture and the evidence — independently verifiable — and the legal conclusions belong to your counsel.